Re: [RFC PATCH] cpuidle: allow per cpu latencies |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cpuidle: allow per cpu latencies
- From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:34:56 +0300
- Cc: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx>, Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>, Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@xxxxxxxxx>, Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20120410102857.GA22721@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
>
> Maybe we also want to make the 'disabled' flag per CPU then or provide some
> other way the number of C states can be different per CPU?
What do you think about this? Do we also want to make the disabled flag per
CPU? Or how should we deal with a different number of C states per CPU?
Thanks,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[ARM Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]
