Re: [RFC 0/4] Add NVIDIA Tegra DRM support |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Add NVIDIA Tegra DRM support
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:24:50 +0200
- Cc: "joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx" <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>, "devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "olof@xxxxxxxxx" <olof@xxxxxxxxx>, "ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx" <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jon Mayo <jmayo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "airlied@xxxxxxxx" <airlied@xxxxxxxx>, "iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20120411.154642.1389197434468515943.hdoyu@nvidia.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
* Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
> > Thierry Reding (3):
> > iommu: tegra/gart: Add device tree support
> > drm: fixed: Add dfixed_frac() macro
> > drm: Add NVIDIA Tegra support
> >
> > Vandana Salve (1):
> > iommu: tegra/gart: use correct gart_device
>
> I guess that the following 2 patches can be merged now, independet of
> the rest of drm patches.
>
> [RFC 1/4] iommu: tegra/gart: use correct gart_device
> [RFC 2/4] iommu: tegra/gart: Add device tree support
Yes, I can probably post those separately so they can be applied
independently. Should they go in via the IOMMU tree or the Tegra
tree?
Thierry
Attachment:
pgpa9ZVrcIrj8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[ARM Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]