On 11/08/2011 03:46 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> Batching commands sounds good. I've not read the patches though. Have
> you measured that how this could improve the performance?
Yes, i have measured the performance. Improvements depend on the workload
type, the storage device characteristics, and the type of the servers.
The main improvement is for IOPS.
I saw (over iser/ib to FusionIo SSD) improvement of 5-20% for write
and 3-15% for read IOPS (1kb) for various loads/setups.
Typical values 55Kiops -> 62Kiops, 90kiops -> 100kiops
iser can enjoy batching because it repeatedly polls the Completion Queue and
may found multiple cmds in one polling sweep. It stores them on a list and
instantly processes it and submits the commands. Here it treats the commands
which already present on the list as a batch, so the processing is never
actually deferred in order to get some more. Only if some commands are
"already here" anyway, are they marked as a batch.
Do you see how other transports, notably iscsi/tcp can employ a similar scheme?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Clusters]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[XFree86]
[Video Devices]