On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:53:22 +0200 (CEST)
**UNKNOWN CHARSET** <fredrik.aslund@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:57:28 +0200
> > Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > > I'm not against having this feature. But I think that tgt-admin should
> > > > enable admins to configure scsi_id and vendor_id. Why it doesn't?
> > >
> > > It does: the above config would generate the following commands (assuming /dev/sdb is a WD disk):
> >
> > So, what's the problem that we try to solve? Admins can specify
> > scsi_id and vendor_id, right?
> >
> Admins can specify scsi_id, scsi_sn and vendor_id for targets, but not for
> the controller itself. All first controllers of all tgt servers will get
> scsi_id "IET 00010000" and scsi_sn "beaf10", making initiators
> believe controllers on different tgt servers are the same.
I see. Thanks. I guess that admins should be able to configure the
controller too but I'm not against adding this feature. Can you resend
the patch with your Signed-off-by? If you are not familiar with
submitting a patch in the linux kernel style, please read:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob_plain;f=Documentation/SubmittingPatches;hb=HEAD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Clusters]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[XFree86]
[Video Devices]