Re: suggestion for Merging LLVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 11/24/2011 08:45 PM, Christopher Li wrote:
>> > I am using llvm 2.9, I guess my llvm is too new?
>
> On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 21:25 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> I would guess too-old.  I use a git checkout from the LLVM repo.
>
> We require LLVM 3.0 which hasn't been released because of this API:

Hmm, how does older version of LLVM deal with structure refering themself?

I hope there is a way so I can at least have an option to use the
released version of LLVM.  I don't mind using LLVM 3.0 if it is there,
but requiring unreleased version of LLVM seems too bleeding edge.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux