|
|
|
(slightly) inconsistent code in evaluate.c:type_difference | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Hello, Sparse devs, in evaluate.c, at lines 623 and 624, t1 and t2 are expected not to be NULL, while a few lines later (630 and 638), they are checked to avoid a NULL pointer dereference. That's at least a bit confusing. Thanks, Jonathan Neuschäfer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Newbies FAQ] [Kernel List] [Site Home] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [DDR & Rambus] [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]