Re: including sparse headers in C++ code

[Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi!

On Don, 2010-11-04 at 17:57 -0700, Christopher Li wrote: 
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Voila.
> 
> -               struct basic_block *true = br->bb_true;
> -               struct basic_block *false = br->bb_false;
> -               br->bb_false = true;
> -               br->bb_true = false;
> +               struct basic_block *true_expr = br->bb_true;
> +               struct basic_block *false_expr = br->bb_false;
> +               br->bb_false = true_expr;
> +               br->bb_true = false_expr;
> 
> Hmm, not very "true" symbol is an expression type. You end up calling
> basicl_block pointer as true_expr, that is misleading.
> Same thing happen to pseudo_t pointers.

Frankly, I don't understand what you mean (especially with the pseudo_t)
- which also explains why the suboptimal variable naming and I cannot
come up with a better name.

> Looks fine otherwise.

Bernd
-- 
mobile: +43 664 4416156              http://www.sysprog.at/
    Linux Software Development, Consulting and Services

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html