On Wed, 30 May 2012, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi Guennadi
>
> > > Thanks.
> > > But sorry. I didn't have any problem.
> > > I noticed it from source-code only, not board behavior.
> >
> > Ok, but did you at least run some tests, where this code-path would be
> > entered, including (runtime-) suspend and resume? If not yet, I think, it
> > would be good to at least run a couple of short tests to make sure we're
> > not causing any obvious regressions. I'll try to find some time later
> > today or tomorrow for this.
>
> Yes. of course I tested my patch on FSI DMAEngine.
> In my test, I didn't get any issue with/without this patch.
>
> I double-checked this issue, but sh7372 has offset bug.
> This is the reason why I added [RFC] on this patch.
I tested a 9-day old next tree with and without your patch with
runtime-suspend - both when the A3SP domain stays on and when it gets
switched off - both versions seem to work, so, at least I don't recognise
any regressions. Unfortunately, I couldn't test system-wide suspend
because of some NFS problem. So, you can also add a (partially-)
Tested-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux OMAP]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]