Re: [PATCH] gpio: Emma Mobile GPIO driver V2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Thursday, May 17, 2012, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 16, 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Do you guys have any preferences how to merge this?
> >> >
> >> > Can I include it together with the EMEV2 SoC bits perhaps? That may be
> >> > easy so we can keep track of the platform data header file dependency.
> >>
> >> For ux500 I made a special "gpio and pins" branch and sent through ARM SoC.
> >
> > The problem is we have a patch depending on the $subject one in the EMEV2
> > series and it would be better to keep them both together if that's not
> > a big deal.
> Dependencies are fine, as long as they are not circular. You can
> either pull in the gpio/pins branch into the EMEV2 branch, or base it
> on it.

I guess I'll try to merge the gpio/pins into the EMEV2 branch.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

Add to Google Powered by Linux