Re: [PATCH 10/10] oom: Make find_lock_task_mm() sparse-aware

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 20:21 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:

> Just wonder how do you see the feature implemented?
> Something like this?
> #define __ret_cond_locked(l, c)	__attribute__((ret_cond_locked(l, c)))
> #define __ret_value		__attribute__((ret_value))
> #define __ret_locked_nonnull(l)	__ret_cond_locked(l, __ret_value);
> extern struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
> 	__ret_locked_nonnull(&__ret_value->alloc_lock);

Yeah, see the email I just CC'ed you on to linux-sparse.

Basically extend __attribute__((context())) to allow things similar to
what you proposed.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

Add to Google Powered by Linux