Re: [PATCH 07/10] um: Should hold tasklist_lock while traversing processes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Am 24.03.2012 11:30, schrieb Anton Vorontsov:
> Traversing the tasks requires holding tasklist_lock, otherwise it
> is unsafe.
> 
> p.s. However, I'm not sure that calling os_kill_ptraced_process()
> in the atomic context is correct. It seem to work, but please
> take a closer look.

os_kill_ptraced_process() calls a host function.
From UML's point of view nothing sleeps, so this is fine.

Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>

Thanks,
//richard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

Add to Google Powered by Linux