Re: [PATCH 08/10] um: Fix possible race on task->mm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Am 24.03.2012 11:30, schrieb Anton Vorontsov:
> Checking for task->mm is dangerous as ->mm might disappear (exit_mm()
> assigns NULL under task_lock(), so tasklist lock is not enough).
> 
> We can't use get_task_mm()/mmput() pair as mmput() might sleep,
> so let's take the task lock while we care about its mm.
> 
> Note that we should also use find_lock_task_mm() to check all process'
> threads for a valid mm, but for uml we'll do it in a separate patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>

Thanks,
//richard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

Add to Google Powered by Linux