Re: [PATCH] dlm, sctp: Do not allocate a fd for peeloff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Vladislav Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:29:20 -0500

> On 03/07/2012 10:41 AM, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
>> avoids allocating a fd that a) propagates to every kernel thread and
>> usermodehelper b) is not properly released.
>> 
>> References: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network.drbd/22529
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@xxxxxxx>
> 
> It might make sense to change sctp_do_peeloff to take the association id as
> the first argument and not do the mapping from id to association yourself.
> It's a bit ugly to expose internal sctp structures outside of SCTP.

Agreed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Free Online Dating]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Powered by Linux