On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:21:11AM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
> First, let me state that I mis-understood what the patch is attempting to do.
> Looking again, I understand this a little better, but still have reservations.
This explains a lot :)
> If we treat the window as strictly available data, then we may end up sending a lot more traffic
> then the window can take thus causing us to enter 0 window probe and potential retransmission
> issues that will trigger congestion control.
> We'd like to avoid that so we put some overhead into our computations. It may not be ideal
> since we do this on a per-chunk basis. It could probably be done on per-packet basis instead.
> This way, we'll essentially over-estimate but under-subscribe our current view of the peers
> window. So in one shot, we are not going to over-fill it and will get an updated view next
> time the SACK arrives.
I will update my patch to include a per packet overhead and also fix the retransmission
rwnd reopening to do the same.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux OMAP]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]