- Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] Fix leaking of kernel heap addresses in net/
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:59:17 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, urs.thuermann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxx, remi.denis-courmont@xxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, sri@xxxxxxxxxx, vladislav.yasevich@xxxxxx, tj@xxxxxxxxxx, eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx, lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, joe@xxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx, adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx, jpirko@xxxxxxxxxx, johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx, daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx, xemul@xxxxxxxxxx, socketcan-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sctp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1289530264.3090.212.camel@Dan>
- References: <1289529269.3090.207.camel@Dan> <20101111.184902.233699247.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1289530264.3090.212.camel@Dan>
From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500
> This has already been suggested, and I agree it is a much better
> approach. If I take this approach, and find some suitable substitute
> for those cases where the socket inode is not available, will you
> consider these changes?
I will consider an approach where the keys reported allow object
tracking equally as the actual pointers allow for right now.
I've said that this is my criteria about 3 times now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux OMAP]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]