[PATCH CLEANUP] sctp: fix the comment of sctp_sf_violation_paramlen()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


The comment about sctp_sf_violation_paramlen() is wrong.

Invalid length should be identified as it does not equal actual length
of a given parameter. The actual length of a given parameter is not including
the padding part.


Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <shanwei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
index edb71e6..8774a6e 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
@@ -4355,8 +4355,8 @@ static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_violation_chunklen(
 
 /*
  * Handle a protocol violation when the parameter length is invalid.
- * "Invalid" length is identified as smaller than the minimal length a
- * given parameter can be.
+ * "Invalid" length is identified as it does not equal actual length
+ * of a given parameter.
  */
 static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_violation_paramlen(
 				     const struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
-- 
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Linux OMAP]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Free Online Dating]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Powered by Linux