On 08/07/12 08:53, Chanho Min wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Indeed. How about the patch below ? Scsi devices are removed from
>> starved_list after blk_cleanup_queue() and before put_device(). That
>> guarantees that inside scsi_run_queue() get_device() under host lock
>> will succeed.
>
> Thanks, IMHO, it's harmless and the simple way to solve this issue.
> But, I think the second half of your patches are not required, extra
> referecne is might suffice?
I'm afraid that without the second half of that patch the following race
is still possible:
- sdev reference count drops to zero while scsi_run_queue() is in
progress and while that sdev is on the starved_list of its SCSI host;
scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext() call is scheduled but not yet
executed.
- scsi_run_queue() takes that sdev off the local starved_list.
- scsi_run_queue() calls get_device() and that call fails since the
sdev reference count is zero.
- scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext() gets scheduled and frees the
sdev.
- scsi_run_queue() proceeds and calls __blk_run_queue() on a freed
queue, which is what we were trying to avoid.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photos]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]