On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Eldad Zack <eldad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
>> In response to an async related regression James noted:
>>
>> "My theory is that this is an init problem: The assumption in a lot of
>> our code is that async_synchronize_full() waits for everything ... even
>> the domain specific async schedules, which isn't true."
>>
>> ...so make this assumption true.
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> I've applied the all 6 patches of this set.
> (HEAD 8874e812feb4926f4a51a82c4fca75c7daa05fc5 , Linus' tree)
>
> I've tested it on the same setup and everything runs fine, and I've
> seen no suspicious messages.
>
> If you'd like, I can test only patch #2 in isolation.
No, I think the testing you've done is enough.
> Tested-by: Eldad Zack <eldad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Much appreciated.
--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photos]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]