Hi. Andrew.
I will do it next time.
Thanks for your advice.
2012/5/23, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:35:36 -0400
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Subject: [PATCH] [SCSI] ufs: fix potential NULL pointer dereferencing
>> error in ufshcd_probe.
>
> Nit: conventionally, the text inside [] is to be discarded by the patch
> recipient, so the title of this patch is
>
> ufs: fix potential NULL pointer dereferencing error in ufshcd_probe.
>
> which makes it look like a patch against fs/ufs/!
>
> There is a fashion lately of people prefixing patch titles along the
> lines of
>
> scsi: ufs: fix potential NULL pointer dereferencing error in
> ufshcd_probe.
>
> or even
>
> drivers: scsi: ufs: fix potential NULL pointer dereferencing error in
> ufshcd_probe.
>
> that's nuts, and I regularly turn this into a proper pathname - why
> not?
>
> drivers/scsi/ufs: fix potential NULL pointer dereferencing error in
> ufshcd_probe.
>
>
> I'll stop now :)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photos]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]