Hi,
On 05/22/12 00:42, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 11:09 AM, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
>> However, when it is target/host that is busy, I think dm should
>> send the request down and let SCSI, which has better knowledge
>> about the shared resource, do appropriate starvation control.
>>
>> Could you try the attached patch?
...
> Thanks, that works fine! I had something else in my mind for multipath, but if this can go into scsi we don't need the multipath patch anymore.
> Are you going to officially submit it (missing signed-off)?
Thank you for testing.
Yes, I'll submit it officially with your Reported-by/Tested-by.
Also, a note suggested by Mike Snitzer will be added to the
patch description. (Thanks Mike.)
--
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photos]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]