On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:37:56PM -0400, chetan loke wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:31:55PM -0400, chetan loke wrote:
> >> > + if (list_empty(&ram_device->commands))
> >> > + wake_up_process(ram_device->thread);
> >>
> >> Didn't look in detail but if the queue is empty then why would you
> >> want to wake up the kthread? What if you just wake_up after
> >> list_add_tail below?
> >
> > If the list is non-empty, then the kthread has already been woken up
> > and doesn't need to be woken again.
>
> Sorry, not able to follow. wait_even_interruptible will put kthread to
> sleep. So how will it be already awake?
Consider the following:
CPU 0 CPU 1
->queuecommand
lock
wakes kthread
queues command 1
unlock
->queuecommand
lock
kthread wakes
lock
queues command 2
unlock
dequeues command 1
dequeues command 2
unlock
See? No need to wake the kthread *if there's already something on the
queue*, because you know it was already woken by whoever put the first
command on the queue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photos]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]