On Tue, May 08 2012 at 2:22am -0400,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/08/2012 05:19 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Use the previously attached scsi_dh if "default" is provided as the
> > hardware handler name (the new 'use_default_hw_handler' flag is set in
> > the multipath structure).
> >
> > Leverage scsi_dh_attach's ability to increment the scsi_dh's reference
> > count if the same scsi_dh name is provided when attaching -- currently
> > attached scsi_dh name is determined with scsi_dh_attached_handler_name.
> >
> Not sure it that's the correct way.
>
> Using 'default' as the hardware handler name has the drawback that
> the original information (ie the original hardware handler name)
> is lost.
BTW, on this point: How is the original handler's name lost with my
patches? I set m->hw_handler_name to the original (aka attached)
handler's name (as returned scsi_dh_attached_handler_name).
"default" is only used as a key to trigger the use of the attached
handler (it causes m->use_default_hw_handler to be set).
Was my description or code somehow unclear? Guess so... otherwise I'd
not be clarifying this... unfortunately I'm not seeing where I fell
short.
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photos]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]