On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Norman Diamond wrote:
> Yes it does look like changing this bridge to CAPACITY_HEURISTICS
> from FIX_CAPACITY is likely to help a bit.
That's easy enough.
> I think that heuristics should also accept multiples of 63 even if
> the total is odd. This doesn't solve everything but will probably
> help more.
Okay, if nobody objects.
> I think that handling of FIX_CAPACITY should check for multiples of
> 63 and report the apparent likelihood that FIX_CAPACITY probably
> wasn't the right setting for the bridge (if it's a bridge). This
> doesn't solve everything but will probably help more.
The FIX_CAPACITY code runs in a different module. It has no way to
know whether the device is a bridge or not.
> The addition of TEST_CAPACITY doesn't solve everything but will
> probably help more.
That will require a certain amount of work, with the possibility of
breaking some systems. I'd rather not do it if there's no clear and
pressing need.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photos]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]