On 03/19/12 17:04, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer. It would be great if you can describe / link
> the actual case the patch is trying to solve.
Another example is the sd scanning code (sd_probe_async()) which can
queue SCSI commands concurrently with the blk_cleanup_queue() call
called (indirectly) from scsi_remove_host().
>
>> there is still a tiny race window left by that patch - new
>> requests can get queued after the SCSI request function has been invoked
>> by scsi_free_queue() and before blk_cleanup_queue() gets invoked. Hence
>> the proposal to change the block layer to make sure that all queued
>> requests get processed eventually.
> I don't think it's a good idea to push requests out to stopped queue.
> Wouldn't aborting all pending requests be better?
Sure, but is that possible from inside the block layer ? With patch
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=133207725114386 applied, the following
code is present at the start of scsi_request_fn():
if (unlikely(blk_queue_dead(q))) {
while ((req = blk_peek_request(q)) != NULL)
scsi_kill_request(req, q);
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photos]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]