On 02/05/2012 11:53 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Thanks for this report, I missed this patch. I thought the reason for the lack
of scsi_cmd_blk_ioctl() it was one of the differences between 2.6.27 and 2.6.32,
so I have adapted the callers I identified to perform the same test as what's
in scsi_cmd_blk_ioctl().
There were other callers in patch 1/3, most notably virtio-blk, that are
not in your patch.
I*think* I did it correctly, but it would be safer
to apply the original patch, of course. Now I see the patch (618 in my queue).
I'll merge it and it will simplify the backport.
Sounds like a plan, thanks!
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photos]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]
