RE: copy offload support in Linux - new system call needed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


> 
> I think that hypervisor vendors will be very interested in this feature
> which
> would explain why vmware was active in drafting both the NFS and T10

Specs are the only way to convince storage-target-vendors ;). Otherwise target-stack will need to implement multiple custom-CDB-handlers for different front-end APIs(which is ugly).


Chetan



��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f



[SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photos]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

Add to Google Powered by Linux