Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI fixes for 2.6.27-rc1

[Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Alan Cox wrote:
> > I thought group (or non-person) submissions where explicitly
> > prohibitted in the signoff section in Documentation/SubmittingPatches
>
> Highpoint is a legal entity so highpoint can enter into agreements. Thats
> a bit different from say "Dave the anonymous ferret" or "three people
> down the pub"
>
> In many ways companies that sign the patches themselves are being nicer
> to their employees than those who encourage the current practise.

(NOTE!! speaking for myself, not for other Red Hatters)

The solution I've settled upon is jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxx for sign-offs, and 
my usual addresses (jeff@garzik, jgarzik@pobox) for all email 
communication and patch posting.

That makes it clear who is really signing off on the patches, while 
still ensuring that if I get fired or leave Red Hat, the flow of 
communication can be largely uninterrupted.

For those who don't know, to prevent sensitive information leaks, it is 
standard corporate policy for many companies these days to immediately 
yank an email address the minute an employee's status changes.

	Jeff


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html