Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] regulator: Add support for MAX77686.

[jonghwa3.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx]

On 2012년 05월 23일 13:16, Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:

>>> +     max77686_update_reg(i2c, MAX77686_REG_BUCK2CTRL1,
>>> +             max77686->ramp_delay << 6, RAMP_MASK);
>>> +     max77686_update_reg(i2c, MAX77686_REG_BUCK3CTRL1,
>>> +             max77686->ramp_delay << 6, RAMP_MASK);
>>> +     max77686_update_reg(i2c, MAX77686_REG_BUCK4CTRL1,
>>> +             max77686->ramp_delay << 6, RAMP_MASK);
>>> +
>>
>>
>> Why do you use i2c client still? If you registered regmap you can use
>> its API. I recommend you to use regmap_update_bits() directly.
>>
>>
> 
> Yes, we are using regmap_update_bits().  max77686_update_reg() is just
> a wrapper over it.
> 


Yes, i know what you mean. However it doesn't need max77686_update_reg()
any more since it uses regmap API. Why don't you just pass iodev->regmap
to regmap_update_bits(). It is clear that there is no reason for using
i2c client as a medium. Please check regulator and mfd driver of my
previous patch.


Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html