|
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: Add support for MAX77686. | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 07:09:27PM +0530, Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
Looks mostly good. A couple of fairly small things:
> +static int max77686_get_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
This looks like it should be regulator_get_voltage_sel_regmap().
> +static int max77686_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> + unsigned sel)
> +{
This looks like it should be regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap().
> + max77686->ramp_delay = pdata->ramp_delay - 1;
> + max77686_update_reg(i2c, MAX77686_REG_BUCK2CTRL1,
> + RAMP_VALUE, RAMP_MASK);
> + max77686_update_reg(i2c, MAX77686_REG_BUCK3CTRL1,
> + RAMP_VALUE, RAMP_MASK);
> + max77686_update_reg(i2c, MAX77686_REG_BUCK4CTRL1,
> + RAMP_VALUE, RAMP_MASK);
This code is unclear because RAMP_VALUE looks like a constant that has
nothing to do with ramp_delay when in fact it's actually this:
> +#define RAMP_VALUE (max77686->ramp_delay << 6)
which isn't constant - this is why I queried this last time. Just
remove the define and write this out directly. The way the code is
written at the minute it looks like ramp_delay is just stored and not
referred to unless you go searching around the rest of the driver.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|
|