Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:21:47AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Note that the point of the DEFINE_RES_*() macros is really to prevent
> > people from coming up with new silly macros to do the same thing, as
> > we've had in the past.
>
> One of the other reaons was to stop the stream of resources with wrong
> endings (because people kept thinking it was exclusive rather than
> inclusive) - and the resulting stream of additional patches to fix those
> errors.
>
> The legacy platforms do have those kinds of errors - when I converted
> SA11x0 as part of a previous patch set, I found a number suffering from
> this error. (Were any found in this patch set? I've not read through
> it.)
>
> I think if this becomes a small %age of the change to Samsung stuff,
> and Kukjin is happy with it, it should go in.
Yes, agree. I will apply this whole series.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Home]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Video Projectors]
[PDAs]
[Free Online Dating]
[Hacking TiVo]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]
[Devices]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[16.7MP]