Re: [PATCH] rcutree: Fix v3.4-rc2-rt2 build break

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, John Kacur wrote:
> > Fix build break of the following types.
> >
> > linux-rt/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h: In function
> > ‘print_cpu_stall_fast_no_hz’:
> > linux-rt/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h:2195: error: ‘rcu_idle_gp_timer’
> > undeclared (first use in this function)
> > linux-rt/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h:2195: error: (Each undeclared
> > identifier is reported only once
> > linux-rt/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h:2195: error: for each function it
> > appears in.)
> >
> > The build break only occurs with the PREEMPT_RT_FULL patch applied,
> > however
> > the patch is meant to go upstream and be applied to v3.4-rc2 as well
> > because
> > it makes the code more legible there, and will reduce the number of
> > places
> > where #ifdef PREEMPT_RT_FULL is required should that go upstream
> > someday.
> I really have no idea what the patch is solving and which particular
> combination of config items is causing the above.

The config combination that causes a build break is


The patch does the following

        The patch moves the skeleton versions of the functions to this section
        Versions of the functions that were causing a build break.

> If you think that the patch should go upstream then please send a
> separate one with a changelog which explains the simplifcation.

Applying the patch upstream causes no functional changes there.
I can try resubmitting a patch for upstream with a clearer changelog.
Or I perhaps I should dig deeper and try to simplify more for
upstream, but this is the simplest way I saw to fix the build break
for rt

> I agree that this ifdef maze can do with simplification, but providing
> a changelog which tells nothing at all does not make it easier to grok
> the problem and understand what's simplified.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

Add to Google Powered by Linux