Custom Search

Re: [PATCH RT] seqlock/rt: Prevent livelocks with seqlocks in RT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 09:18 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> > Because read_seqlocks are used in the VDSO area, a raw_read_seqcount_begin()
> > was created to allow userspace tasks to access read_seqcount().
> > As the grabbing of the write_lock() is not allowed in VDSO, nor
> > is even referencing it.
> This is completely bogus. The VDSO update write side runs with
> interrupts disabled, so it cannot be preempted at all.
> > Note, a live lock can still happen if the userspace task that
> > does the read_seqlock is of higher priority than a user doing
> > the write_lock, so userspace needs to be careful.
> What the hell are you smoking?


I forgot I still had that in my changelog. I wrote this code before I
had your changes. I noticed later that the vdso seqlocks were raw
spinlocks and shouldn't be an issue. As you told me that you had this
fixed, I never bothered to change the log.

Then last night when I hit this bug, I simply cherry picked this fixed
and posted it.

-- Steve

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

Add to Google Powered by Linux