Custom Search

Re: [PATCH RT 2/2 v4] preempt-rt/x86: Delay calling signals in int3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 02/06, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 20:31 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Damn. Sorry for noise...
> >
> > On 02/05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > +int force_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t)
> > > +{
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
> > > +	if (in_atomic()) {
> > > +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(t != current))
> >
> > This is certainly wrong in upstream kernel. It does use force_
> > this way although it shouldn't imho.
>
> It's wrong in upstream even with the #ifdef define here?

No, the patch has no effect if !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

Add to Google Powered by Linux