Re: Strange behavior of pthread_setaffinity_np
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I think I solved the question:
pthread_setaffinity_np is based on sched_setaffinity syscall.
Actually sched_setaffinity performs a read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
However, with the introduction of the PREEMPT_RT patch, the read_lock
is preemptible, thats why the Thread T0 Yields in favor of T2.
I think the sched.c should be revised regarding the PREEMPT_RT patch,
and the scheduling related syscalls should adopt non pre-emptible
(e.g. raw_spinlock_t) spinlocks rather than preemptible one, in order
to avoid unwilling behaviors like the one showed.
Regards,
Primiano
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Primiano Tucci <p.tucci@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am an Italian researcher and I am working on a Real Time scheduling
> infrastructure. I am currently using Linux Kernel 2.6.29.6-rt24-smp
> (PREEMPT-RT Patch) running on a Intel Q9550 CPU.
> I am experiencing strange behaviors with the pthread_setaffinity_np API.
>
> This is my scenario, I have 4 Real Time Threads (SCHED_FIFO)
> distributed as follows:
>
> T0 : CPU 0, Priority 2 (HIGH)
> T1 : CPU 1, Priority 2 (HIGH)
> T3 : CPU 0, Priority 1 (LOW)
> T4 : CPU 1, Priority 1 (LOW)
>
> So T0 and T1 are actually the "big bosses" on CPUs #0 and #1, T3 and
> T4, instead, never execute (let's assume that each thread is a simple
> busy wait that never sleeps/yields)
> Now, at a certain point, from T0 code, I want to migrate T4 from CPU
> #1 to #0, keeping its low priority.
> Therefore I perform a pthread_setaffinity_np from T0 changing T4 mask
> from CPU #1 to #0.
>
> In this scenario it happens that T3 (that should never execute since
> there is T0 with higher priority currently running on the same CPU #0)
> "emerge" and executes for a bit.
> It seems that the pthread_setaffinity_np syscall is somehow
> "suspensive" for the time needed to migrate T4 and let the scheduler
> to execute T3 for that bunch of time.
>
> Is this behavior expected (I did not find any documentation about
> this)? How can avoid it?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Primiano
>
> --
> Primiano Tucci
> http://www.primianotucci.com
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[RT Stable]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]