Re: RFC: THE OFFLINE SCHEDULER
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 14:03 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > I asked the questions I did out of pure curiosity, and that curiosity
> > has been satisfied. It's not that I find it useless or whatnot (or that
> > my opinion matters to anyone but me;). I personally find the concept of
> > injecting an RTOS into a general purpose OS with no isolation to be
> > alien. Intriguing, but very very alien.
>
> Well lets work on the isolation piece then. We could run a regular process
> on the RT cpu and switch back when OS services are needed?
If there were isolation, that would make it much less alien to _me_.
Isolation would kinda destroy the reason it was written though. RT
application/OS is injected into the network stack, which is kinda cool,
but makes the hairs on my neck stand up.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[RT Stable]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]