Re: Cyclictest expected results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Robert,

I am sorry for delay.

By enabling ACPI on my PC I get acpi_pm

I am also getting :
root@rd cycletest]# ./cyclictest -t 1 -p80 -n -i 10000 -l 10000 -q
T: 0 ( 2709) P:80 I:10000 C:  10000 Min:      8 Act:   16 Avg:   16 Max:      44
[root@rd cycletest]# ./cyclictest -t 1 -p80 -i 10000 -l 10000 -q
T: 0 ( 2723) P:80 I:10000 C:  10000 Min:     21 Act:   30 Avg:   29 Max:     139
[root@rd cycletest]#

These numbers are quite impressive as compared to old numbers.

Thanks for your help.

I am quite strange why I start getting RT performance with ACPI. why I
need ACPI on my PC, I dont even use ACPI on my Laptop.

But I am not able to see performance difference in my GNOME
Environment. It is still very very slow, how can I boost X-Windows by
-rt patch.

Thank you,

Jaswinder Singh.

On 10/2/07, Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 09:00:42AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> > /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource :
> > tsc pit jiffies
>
> Can you try to enable ACPI on the box and check if you get an acpi_pm?
>
> Robert
> --
> Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
> Entwicklungszentrum Nord     http://www.pengutronix.de
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux