Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces
Michal Ostrowski a écrit :
> Access of po->pppoe_dev is guarded by sk->sk_state & PPPOX_CONNECTED,
> and all use cases now rely on the socket lock. Because of this, the
> ref-count on the namespace held by the socket object suffices to hold
> the namespace in existence and so we don't need to ref-count the
> namespace in PPPoE. The flush_lock is gone.
>
Seems good !
But can we use lock_sock() in __pppoe_xmit() context ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- References:
- kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces
- From: Denys Fedoryschenko
- Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces
- Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces
- Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces
- Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces
- Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces
- Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces
- Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces
- Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces
- Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces
[Linux Audio Users]
[Hams]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]
[Fedora Users]