- To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
- From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:14:32 +0200
- Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rob Lee <rob.lee@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lists Linaro-dev <linaro-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivered-to: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <201207022149.36629.rjw@sisk.pl>
- References: <4FDEE98D.7010802@linaro.org> <CACRpkdYaLweX-4YkWotuFFWoqEjOLKoNCsurCxxWNfq7QznPnw@mail.gmail.com> <4FF19947.3040608@linaro.org> <201207022149.36629.rjw@sisk.pl>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
On 07/02/2012 09:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, July 02, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> On 07/02/2012 11:09 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Lezcano
>>> <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> we discussed last week to put in place a tree grouping the cpuidle
>>>> modifications [1]. Is it possible to add the tree ?
>>>>
>>>> git://git.linaro.org/people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git #cpuidle-next
>>>
>>> Thanks for doing this.
>>>
>>> Since MAINTAINERS is lacking a listed maintainer for cpuidle,
>>> are you also going to add yourself as maintainer and list this
>>> tree in that file, or is this a one-time exercise?
>>
>> I will be glad to do that if Len and Rafael agree on that.
>
> Len Brown has been a cpuidle maintainer for some time now. Moreover,
> he's been taking patches, but Linus refused to pull his entire tree during the
> last merge window (as you probably know). I honestly don't think this is
> a good enough reason for replacing him as a cpuidle maintainer by force.
>
> So, you should ask Len whether or not he's willing to pass the cpuidle
> maintenance to someone else.
No, no. You are misunderstanding what I am proposing. I don't want to
replace Len I just want to act as a "proxy". I understand a maintainer
can be busy and could not have enough time to take care of the subsystem
is maintaining during a period because he's too busy for that.
Trust me, I fully understand that :)
As there are a lot of modifications of cpuidle, I am proposing to take
the patches when they are acked-by, to create a consolidated tree,
providing a better integration for cpuidle, a wider testing, preventing
conflicts and facilitating Len's work if he agrees to pull from this tree.
If that makes sense to add myself to the MAINTAINER file as a
co-maintainer (understand: send to me also the patches, so I can take
care of them if Len does not respond), I am ok with that.
It is just about helping :)
> I know that Len hasn't been responsive recently, but I also know that he
> _does_ respond to inquiries sent directly to him.
Do you mean to its intel address ?
Thanks
-- Daniel
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
[Netdev]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless]
[CPU Freq]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]
[Free Dating]
[Archives]