On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Eduardo Valentin
<eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch exposes the definitions under control.h to
> drivers outside the machine code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx>
> ---
After second thought, this complete header movement needs to avoided.
Drivers should not anyway include something like <mach/control.h>
May be split the control.h header file data into ..
- defines used by mach-omap2/* files which can remain in "control.h"
in existing location.
- common functions/defines used across drivers/*, mach-omap2/*,
plat-omap/*, should
go to include/linux/omap_control.h
- Driver specific defines like thermal, usb etc, should go to
respective drivers file.
What do you think ?
Regards
santosh
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
[Netdev]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless]
[CPU Freq]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]
[Free Dating]
[Archives]