Hello Joe,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:08:50PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 16:41 +0300, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:13:20AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> > > From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Use the current logging style.
> []
> > We should get the struct dev in thermal_zone_device, I think it makes
> > more sense to use the dev_* helper functions.
> []
> > The orig argument could probably be changed to a thermal zone device
> > and the we use it's id as orig for the message.
> > What do you think?
>
> dev_<level> should be used instead of pr_<level> when
> an appropriate struct device * is available.
Agreed that we need a struct device *. My comments are based on the fact
that you have one of it inside the struct therma_zone_device, field device.
Isn't that struct device appropriated enough to be used by the dev_* functions?
>
> cheers, Joe
>
Cheers,
Eduardo
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
[Netdev]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless]
[CPU Freq]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]
[Free Dating]
[Archives]