[PATCH 03/76] ACPI: ignore FADT reset-reg-sup flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>

we check that the address is non-zero later anyway.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11533

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c |    3 +--
 drivers/acpi/reboot.c         |    3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c
index 9d38eb6..fe1fb63 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxface.c
@@ -74,8 +74,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_reset(void)
 
 	/* Check if the reset register is supported */
 
-	if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER) ||
-	    !reset_reg->address) {
+	if (!reset_reg->address) {
 		return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NOT_EXIST);
 	}
 
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/reboot.c b/drivers/acpi/reboot.c
index a6c77e8b..c1d6124 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/reboot.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/reboot.c
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ void acpi_reboot(void)
 	/* Is the reset register supported? The spec says we should be
 	 * checking the bit width and bit offset, but Windows ignores
 	 * these fields */
-	if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER))
-		return;
+	/* Ignore also acpi_gbl_FADT.flags.ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER */
 
 	reset_value = acpi_gbl_FADT.reset_value;
 
-- 
1.7.10.rc2.19.gfae9d

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux Resources]     [Free Dating]     [Archives]
Add to Google Powered by Linux