Re: [PATCH] CPUIdle: Reevaluate C-states under CPU load to favor deeper C-states

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Hey Kevin,
I would like to try out this patch in my platform see the benefits
that you are reporting. But there is one issue in this patch. You have
not initialized "hrtimer_timeout" variable.
This will always be 0 right ?.
Thanks,
-M

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Chalhoub, Nicole <n-chalhoub@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Deepthi,
>
>>
> Texas Instruments France SA, 821 Avenue Jack Kilby, 06270 Villeneuve Loubet. 036 420 040 R.C.S Antibes. Capital de EUR 753.920
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Deepthi Dharwar [mailto:deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 12:13 PM
>> To: Hilman, Kevin
>> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Arjan van de Ven; linux-arm-
>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>> pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Chalhoub, Nicole
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] CPUIdle: Reevaluate C-states under CPU load to favor
>> deeper C-states
>
> [...]
>> By setting timers when we enter non-deepest C-state possible, such that
>> when it fires we
>> can re-evaluate and try moving into deeper and deeper C-states enhancing
>> the
>> power savings is a good feature to have.
>>
>> Looking at the current implementation, is it possible to have it as
>> configurable option
>> where one can enable/disable this functionality through the backhand
>> driver ?
>
> The timeout values of the c state timers are set in the backhand driver.
> By setting the timeout to 0 the timers will not fire so you'll not have this functionality enabled
>
>> Also I am thinking, instead of having them in governor
>> wouldnt it be a good idea to have it implemented in
>> the backhand driver itself ?
>> --Deepthi
>
>
> In fact each C-state had its own configurable timer, so it is a parameter characterizing a C-state as it is for the exit_latency and target_residency parameters.
> And we wanted the timer to fire only when we do not go in deep Cstate due to a high load. This decision is made in the CPU idle governor. So the functionality should be seen from the governor..
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Nicole
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm



[Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux Resources]     [Free Dating]     [Archives]
Add to Google Powered by Linux