- To: Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] cpuidle: Add a sysfs entry to disable specific C state for debug purpose.
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:46:19 -0700
- Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ShuoX Liu <shuox.liu@xxxxxxxxx>, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, andi.kleen@xxxxxxxxx, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, "linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivered-to: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1331686500.1916.172.camel@ymzhang>
- References: <CAGF5oy_BUytjeDa8Oc62pRabaEqwqKCFuVJuzLd-XNZg34ne2w@mail.gmail.com> <1330998885.1916.89.camel@ymzhang> <20120306052236.GA19416@kroah.com> <1331013078.1916.103.camel@ymzhang> <20120306143935.GA23346@kroah.com> <20120312181151.GE14020@sirena.org.uk> <20120312192936.GC24873@kroah.com> <1331602594.1916.155.camel@ymzhang> <20120313192949.GA8568@kroah.com> <1331686500.1916.172.camel@ymzhang>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 08:55:00AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 12:29 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:36:34AM +0800, Yanmin Zhang wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:29 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:11:51PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 06:39:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Do you know of any tools using these files? I have never heard of them,
> > > > > > and I was told we should move these files years ago. So I don't think
> > > > > > there should be any api issues.
> > > > >
> > > > > powertop uses them.
> > > >
> > > > Ok, then we can't move them all.
> > > >
> > > > We should then just move the ones that have multiple lines, as I'm
> > > > pretty sure powertop doesn't use them, right?
> > > All sys files under cpu/cpuXXX/cpuidle have single line. If we move
> > > some files to debugfs and keep others under sysfs, users might be confused.
> > >
> > > Should we go back to the 1st version which just adds the new entry to
> > > sysfs?
> >
> > Wait, I thought this whole thing started when we wanted to move the
> > files that had multiple lines out of sysfs?
> No. Liu Shuo's patch adds a new entry under cpu/cpuXXX/cpuidle and users
> can disable specific C state.
> A gentleman raised that if we should move it to debugfs, then you suggested
> to move all files under cpu/cpuXXX/cpuidle to debugfs.
>
> >
> > If none of these do, and they all are being used by tools already, then
> > fine, they should stay.
> Agree.
>
> >
> > But for some reason, I thought there was a problem here. Perhaps that
> > was in the cpufreq code?
> I checked cpufreq quickly. Every file has single-line, but some have
> multiple-fields.
>
> We would send a new patch based on sysfs as the new entry has
> single line.
Then that's fine, I'm very sorry for getting this wrong the first time
and causing you extra work. I owe you all the drink of your choice the
next time I see you.
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
[Netdev]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless]
[CPU Freq]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]
[Free Dating]
[Archives]