Re: [PATCH 2/4] thermal: Add generic cpufreq cooling implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sundar,

Hi Amit,

> At the moment it doesn't. But there was some discussion around
> creating something that will work with devfreq. This would allow
> peripheral drivers to be plugged in as well. Amit is investigating
> that at present.

What if we work towards a generic constraint framework which models
thermals as a performance constraint.

Drivers can register to this constraint; platform code can then decide
to issue restrictions either to the CPU or other power-hungry
peripherals based on the platform conditions.

That also allows to model CPU frequency as a generic constraint but
via an actual consumer, say the thermal driver.

Cheers!

-- 
---------
The views expressed in this email are personal and do not necessarily
echo my employers.
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux Resources]     [Free Dating]     [Archives]
Add to Google Powered by Linux