Re: [PATCH] input: CPU frequency booster

[Antti P Miettinen <amiettinen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> writes:
> I can't see why pm_qos is needed at all, better use cpufreq
> providing interface.

One reason for using PM QoS is that it provides an interface for user
space. We want to be able to control frequency also from user space.

	--Antti

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm