Re: [PATCH] input: CPU frequency booster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> writes:
> I can't see why pm_qos is needed at all, better use cpufreq
> providing interface.

One reason for using PM QoS is that it provides an interface for user
space. We want to be able to control frequency also from user space.


linux-pm mailing list

[Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux Resources]     [Free Dating]     [Archives]
Add to Google Powered by Linux