Hello,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:42:53AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Okay, narrowed exit path protection down to setting of PF_EXITING
> > itself. ->exit() on dangling tasks is a bit weird but I don't think
> > it's too bad. Frederic, are you okay with this version?
>
> Yeah that new scheme that only protects PF_EXITING may look a bit
> strange. But I think we are fine. With rcu list traversal, it should
> be safe even if a group member is concurrently dropped from the list (in that
> case all we check if its PF_EXITING then we give up). And we may
> have a concurrent ->exit() but that should be fine too.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Awesome, adding Acked-by, putting it on top of pm-freezer and pushing
it out to linux-next.
Thank you.
--
tejun
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
[Netdev]
[Ethernet Bridging]
[Linux Wireless]
[CPU Freq]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Security]
[Linux for Hams]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux Admin]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]
[Free Dating]
[Archives]