Re: [PATCH -next] PM: Simplify the new suspend/hibernation framework for devices | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Mon 2008-10-06 22:46:05, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 6 of October 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > I promised at the KS that I would simplify the new suspend/hibernation > > framework for devices to avoid the confusion with two types of PM > > operations and pointers to PM operations from too many places. > > > > The appended patch is intended for this purpose. Unfortunately, I can't > > split it into subsystem-related patches, because compilation would be broken > > between them. > > > > The patch applies to linux-next, but it's trivial to make it apply to the > > mainline. It's been compiled on x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit) and tested > > on hp nx6325, doesn't appear to break anything. > > This one had a checkpatch.pl problem, sorry for that. Updated patch is > appended. Seems ok to me. ACK. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
[Site Home] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [CPU Freq] [Kernel Newbies] [Fedora Kernel] [Memory] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux Resources] [Free Dating]
![]() |
![]() |