Re: [PATCH] perf: Add a new sort order: SORT_INCLUSIVE (v4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On 3/24/12 7:14 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

The other problem in branch stacks/LBR is that they're
sampled branches. Just because I got a sample with:

a ->  b
b ->  c

doesn't necessarily mean that the callchain was a ->  b ->  c.

Not sure what you mean. If you have a ->  b, b ->  c in single
LBR sample it means you got a ->  b ->  c.

I was going by Stephane's commit message here:

> Statistical sampling of taken branch should not be confused
> for branch tracing. Not all branches are necessarily captured

Stephane, could you please explain if the 16 filtered branches in LBR are guaranteed to be from a given callchain to the leaf function? My understanding is that it's not.

callchain1: a -> b -> d -> e (sample a->b)
callchain2: a -> c -> b -> f (sample b->f)

on PMU interrupt can we end up with:

b -> f <- top of stack
a -> b

even though a -> b -> f can never happen in the actual program flow?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Free Online Dating]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

Add to Google Powered by Linux