On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 09:45 -0700, David Ahern wrote: > > On 03/10/11 09:20, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >>> I think the merge with the libraries you mention is something that is > >>> not a precondition to merging David's work. > >>> > >>> And his work is at least moving things in the trace parts of tools/, > >>> that was so far dormant. > >> > >> Note, I'm not saying that his work should be put on hold. I actually > >> want to start it up again. Maybe I worded this response wrong. It was > >> more about bringing David up to speed on what I want to do next than > >> saying not to do this work. > > > > Right, I just wanted to make sure he doesn't spill his coffee with what > > could seem like yet another requirement to work on infrastructure to get > > his legitimate feature implementation merged :-) > > I appreciate the clarification. Luckily, no coffee in hand. > > I need to get the time-of-day strings done next, and someone else is > pushing the reverse callchain display (another local change I wanted to > get upstream). I could take a look at other requests - like common code > - as time allows. Right, we could start looking at making the common code on top of your changes. I don't want to hinder progress for asking for too much. Thanks, -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html