Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] ACPI based system device hotplug framework

[Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/08/2012 07:38 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:

>> It is nice to see redundant ACPI namespace walks removed from the ACPI
>> drivers.  But why do you need to add a new enumerator to create the
>> acpihp_slot tree, in addition to the current acpi_device tree?  I'd
>> prefer hotplug features to be generally integrated into the current ACPI
>> core code and data structures, instead of adding a new layer on top of
>> it.
> The idea comes from PCI hotplug framework, which has an concepts of PCI
> hotplug slot and PCI device. For system device hotplug, we could follow
> the same model as PCI by abstracting control points as slots. By introducing
> of hotplug slot, we could:
>
> 1) Report all hotplug slots and slot's capabilities to user, no matter whether
> there are devices connecting to a slot. If we integrate hotplug functionality
> into current ACPI device tree, the slot (or device) is only visible when the
> connected devices are enabled.

In PCI, the idea of a slot is a pretty explicit -- you can look at the
capabilities of a bridge device and see whether it supports hot-add of
a device below it.  Is it the same way in ACPI?  My impression is that
it is not: there will be a parent ACPI device under which a new device
can be added, but you might not be able to tell by looking at the
parent device that hot-add is possible.  I thought the platform could
just give us a Notify event on the parent, asking us to rescan the
namespace below it and potentially discover new devices.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html